Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phillip Dobson's avatar

Entrepreneurship is not as attractive as it once was for many reasons, but the main one is competition. Large corporations are taking over what small businesses used to do, from publishing books to selling clothes. The online publishing business is a good example, where self-publishing has become a business designed to shift money from the author to Amazon, Facebook, and a myriad of marketing companies. A small business selling clothes, shoes, or toys faces the same oppressing competition. The economies of scale are enormous... ask Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk.

If a young person starts a business, they need capital, and personal guarantees are a given, meaning if the fail, they will lose everything including their house and any investments they've made in a pension fund. The risk/reward is heavily skewed against anyone who starts a business. If the entrepreneur succeeds in a substantial way, a large corporation will sell under his cost, with prices the small entrepreneur can't compete against. It is death by a thousand cuts, and it is a soul-destroying experience.

Government 'lenders of last resort' demand the same personal guarantees as banks, and are at least as merciless when it comes to collection. The most ruthless of all is the government-owned Farm Credit Corporation, and they are responsible for more bankruptcies than any bank I know of.

Good ideas are out there, and there are young ambitious men and women who are willing to invest their ideas and time. They should not be threatened with poverty if the idea doesn't make money. ACOA, IRAP and other government programs employ experts to look at ideas before they invest, and personal guarantees should not be required. The idea and the work should be enough.

I worked for Google X for a short time as an independent contractor and was exposed to their search for 'Black Swans,' investments in ideas that would certainly fail, and when they failed, the losses were spectacular. No one lost their job—Google paid the bill and considered the whole thing worthwhile because of the knowledge they had accumulated. Google considers a 'black swan' from a monetary perspective to be a knowledge asset, and education of their employees and the public, and thereby the accumulation of information from failed projects is part of their business model. Profitability flows from there. Our government should take a page from Google's book and invest in ideas without destroying the entrepreneur for a 'black swan.' Black swans can be a beautiful thing.

"You can't pre-business-plan a moonshot any more than you can paint a masterpiece using paint-by-numbers given to you by a committee." Astro Teller at Google X.

Expand full comment

No posts